Inside Trade

September 26, 2025

Court of International Trade

CIT keeps de minimis challenge moving during tariff appeals, rejecting DOJ

The Court of International Trade will move forward with a challenge to President Trump’s termination of the de minimis duty-free entry program for Chinese shipments valued at $800 or less after it refused the Justice Department’s call to freeze the case during broader litigation over tariffs on China and other U.S. trading partners. CIT’s one-paragraph order -- issued late on June 5 as a simple docket entry in the de minimis case, without an opinion explaining the judges’ reasoning --...

DOJ: No reason to accelerate California’s tariff appeal

The Justice Department is pushing a federal appeals court not to expedite California’s challenge to International Emergency Economic Powers Act tariffs, saying the state’s insistence on keeping its case separate out of the Court of International Trade means any delay it now faces is “self-inflicted.” The Golden State’s claim that it faces irreparable harm from prolonged litigation over the IEEPA tariffs “cannot be squared with plaintiffs’ deliberate choice to forgo transfer to the CIT,” DOJ wrote in a June 5...

Plaintiffs eye September arguments in appeals of district courts’ IEEPA rulings

The plaintiffs in two International Emergency Economic Powers Act tariff suits filed outside the Court of International Trade are asking appellate judges to “expedite” the cases for argument in September -- though the Justice Department is agreeing to that schedule in just one court while signaling it will oppose it in the other. California and a pair of education-technology companies filed motions to expedite the appeals of their respective tariff cases on June 4 and 5, respectively -- each saying...

Plaintiffs: Warnings of ‘disaster’ from IEEPA ruling have come to nothing

Democratic attorneys general and small businesses challenging President Trump’s International Emergency Economic Powers Act tariffs say the White House has undermined its own claims that a decision overturning the duties poses a “disaster scenario” for trade negotiations, after key officials said the talks are continuing and they have other authorities to impose similar tariffs. Both sets of plaintiffs that won a landmark Court of International Trade decision rejecting the IEEPA tariffs last week filed new briefs on June 2 urging...

Lower courts yield to appellate judges on DOJ’s bid to stay IEEPA tariff rulings

Judges on both the Court of International Trade and the federal district court for Washington, DC, are letting appellate courts decide whether to enforce their decisions holding President Trump’s International Emergency Economic Powers Act tariffs unlawful, pushing any clear resolution on that question to next week or later. Less than an hour apart on June 3, both the three-judge CIT panel that overturned the tariffs and Judge Rudolph Contreras, who authored a similar decision for the U.S. District Court for...

Judge rejects California’s bid to keep IEEPA suit away from CIT, teeing up quick appeal

A federal judge in California has ruled that the state’s challenge to Trump administration tariffs under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act belongs in the Court of International Trade but is allowing California officials to immediately appeal her decision rather than sending the case to CIT, as the Justice Department preferred. “The question before the Court is not whether the challenged tariffs are constitutional; instead, the question is whether this action arises out of a law providing for tariffs such...

DOJ asks DC Circuit to block second ruling reversing IEEPA tariffs

A federal district judge committed a “litany of errors” when he refused to send a challenge to President Trump’s International Emergency Economic Powers Act tariffs to the Court of International Trade and instead declared them unlawful, the Justice Department said Monday in new filings seeking to block his decision during an appeal. DOJ on June 2 asked both the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia and the Washington, DC, federal district court to stay Judge Rudolph Contreras’s...

CIT weighs pausing still-pending IEEPA suits to await appellate decisions

Plaintiffs in two Court of International Trade tariff suits are clashing with the Justice Department over whether their cases should continue after CIT struck down President Trump’s International Emergency Economic Powers Act duties, with each side arguing that its approach will simplify the complex litigation now playing out in multiple courts. Following CIT’s May 28 ruling that the tariffs exceeded Trump’s statutory authority, DOJ has asked the trade court to stay its two other pending cases that also touch on...

DOJ says court order scrapping IEEPA tariffs would revive de minimis

A now-stayed Court of International Trade decision overturning President Trump’s International Emergency Economic Powers Act tariffs would also mandate that the administration reinstate de minimis duty-free entry for shipments from China worth $800 or less, according to the Justice Department. In a May 30 filing for a pending CIT challenge to the de minimis policy, DOJ wrote that the court’s order barring “the operation of” any presidential directive to impose tariffs under the IEEPA effectively mandates the return of de...

U.S. trading partners react tentatively to CIT's ruling on Trump’s tariffs 

U.S. trading partners on Thursday reacted tentatively to a U.S. Court of International Trade decision – now stayed – to overturn many of President Trump’s tariffs, as officials, stakeholders and analysts suggested that litigation may not soon resolve questions about where Trump’s trade policy is headed. The CIT late Wednesday ruled that Trump overstepped his authority when he used the International Emergency Economic Powers Act to impose tariffs on nearly all U.S. trading partners. The administration, arguing that the ruling...

Not a subscriber?

Request 30 days free access to exclusive, behind-the-scenes reporting on trade policy in the Trump era.